• About us
  • Impressum
  • Contact
CIVIL Today
  • HOME
  • NEWSROOM
  • POLITICS
  • SOCIETY
  • OPINION
    • EDITORIAL
    • POINT OF VIEW
  • WORLD
  • WAR IN UKRAINE
    • All
    • А YEAR OF HEROISM
    • БОРОТЬБА УКРАЇНИ
    Academic Voices, Propaganda Echoes: How Intellectuals in the Balkans Reinforce Pro-Russian Narratives

    Academic Voices, Propaganda Echoes: How Intellectuals in the Balkans Reinforce Pro-Russian Narratives

    History Reloaded: The Price of Appeasing Russia

    History Reloaded: The Price of Appeasing Russia

    Alaska Summit Fallout: Europe Rejects Illusions, Stands Firm with Ukraine

    Alaska Summit Fallout: Europe Rejects Illusions, Stands Firm with Ukraine

    The Alaska Humiliation: A Theatrical Farce and a Failure Written in Advance – Putin’s Legitimacy, Trump’s Humiliation

    The Alaska Humiliation: A Theatrical Farce and a Failure Written in Advance – Putin’s Legitimacy, Trump’s Humiliation

    War, Truth & Free Media – With Lina Kushch, Jabir Deralla & Roger Casale

    War, Truth & Free Media – With Lina Kushch, Jabir Deralla & Roger Casale

    Deralla for UKRINFORM: Ukraine is the agenda!

    From Social Media to the Corridors of Power: Stop Telling Ukraine to Give Up Land, Start Telling Russia to Give It Back

    And This Is Only the Beginning

    And This Is Only the Beginning

    Innocent Blood for a Handshake – and a Nobel Peace Prize Fantasy

    Innocent Blood for a Handshake – and a Nobel Peace Prize Fantasy

    The false claims about the protests in Ukraine and the Serbian-Russian propaganda narratives in the media in North Macedonia

    The false claims about the protests in Ukraine and the Serbian-Russian propaganda narratives in the media in North Macedonia

No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • NEWSROOM
  • POLITICS
  • SOCIETY
  • OPINION
    • EDITORIAL
    • POINT OF VIEW
  • WORLD
  • WAR IN UKRAINE
    • All
    • А YEAR OF HEROISM
    • БОРОТЬБА УКРАЇНИ
    Academic Voices, Propaganda Echoes: How Intellectuals in the Balkans Reinforce Pro-Russian Narratives

    Academic Voices, Propaganda Echoes: How Intellectuals in the Balkans Reinforce Pro-Russian Narratives

    History Reloaded: The Price of Appeasing Russia

    History Reloaded: The Price of Appeasing Russia

    Alaska Summit Fallout: Europe Rejects Illusions, Stands Firm with Ukraine

    Alaska Summit Fallout: Europe Rejects Illusions, Stands Firm with Ukraine

    The Alaska Humiliation: A Theatrical Farce and a Failure Written in Advance – Putin’s Legitimacy, Trump’s Humiliation

    The Alaska Humiliation: A Theatrical Farce and a Failure Written in Advance – Putin’s Legitimacy, Trump’s Humiliation

    War, Truth & Free Media – With Lina Kushch, Jabir Deralla & Roger Casale

    War, Truth & Free Media – With Lina Kushch, Jabir Deralla & Roger Casale

    Deralla for UKRINFORM: Ukraine is the agenda!

    From Social Media to the Corridors of Power: Stop Telling Ukraine to Give Up Land, Start Telling Russia to Give It Back

    And This Is Only the Beginning

    And This Is Only the Beginning

    Innocent Blood for a Handshake – and a Nobel Peace Prize Fantasy

    Innocent Blood for a Handshake – and a Nobel Peace Prize Fantasy

    The false claims about the protests in Ukraine and the Serbian-Russian propaganda narratives in the media in North Macedonia

    The false claims about the protests in Ukraine and the Serbian-Russian propaganda narratives in the media in North Macedonia

No Result
View All Result
CIVIL Today
No Result
View All Result
Home OPINION

Silence in Suits

Progressive elites talk metrics while the world burns. Their inaction feeds the very forces they claim to fight.

May 22, 2025
in ANALYSIS, DEMOCRACY, OPINION
Silence in Suits
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Xhabir Deralla

It has long been more than obvious that corporate culture and elitism now define many self-proclaimed progressive civil society organizations (CSOs or NGOs, as you wish).These entities often operate in isolation, producing low-impact outputs with limited public value. Far from acting as multipliers of democratic energy, they neither seek to engage broader civic networks, nor empower others to amplify their work. Their growth is rooted not in grassroots legitimacy or societal relevance, but in their ability to appease donors, many of whom they are effectively spin-offs of. Born from donor-driven projects, they’ve evolved into robust bureaucratic machines designed primarily to meet administrative demands and digest large funding streams, often with little or no discernible effect on the real world.

This critique does not stop at CSOs. These patterns are visible across a broader spectrum of actors who claim to advance democracy – progressives, democrats, and moderates alike. Political parties that wear democratic values as branding often operate as elitist clubs, where messaging replaces mobilization and leadership speaks past its base rather than with it. Many think-tanks produce polished papers brimming with jargon and metrics, yet fail to connect with the lived experiences of real people or offer grounded solutions. Even fact-checkers often reduce truth to a technical procedure, stripping it of social and political context, moral clarity, or systemic critique.

One of the core reasons these structures struggle to earn public trust is their failure to act as genuine public resources for democratic resilience. They show little interest in building relationships with the citizens they claim to represent. Communication with the public is one-directional, sterile, and transactional – void of dialogue, humility, or solidarity. Most of them lack any meaningful constituency, no community base, no engaged membership, and no active collaborative ties with formal or informal civic initiatives.

Instead, they mirror the behavior of the very institutions they should be holding accountable – hierarchical and opaque. Their activities follow bureaucratic templates devoid of soul, context, or community relevance. Even their public outreach is cold and formulaic, often limited to rigid formats that reflect corporate branding more than civic engagement. Feedback mechanisms, when they exist at all, merely simulate participation through limited and sanitized tools designed to protect reputations, not to provoke growth or transformation.

They also suffer from a form of hollow academism – methodologically sound on paper, yet devoid of moral courage, real-world relevance, or transformative vision. Their language is steeped in technicalities and sterile formalism, often crafted more to impress funders, peers – or themselves – than to engage communities or confront systems of injustice. In the end, they reproduce a sterile intellectual culture that prioritizes institutional self-preservation over public service, and metrics over meaning.

Their response to burning challenges – wars, war crimes, and gross human rights violations – is often cautious, muted, or entirely absent. They pick and choose whose rights to defend, frequently prioritizing those within their inner circles or political comfort zones, rather than those most vulnerable or in need. Their advocacy is selective and risk-averse, overly careful not to offend powerful institutions, governments, or media conglomerates, even when silence means complicity.

When they become targets of hate campaigns or public criticism, their reaction is rarely one of principled defiance. Instead, they revert to corporate-style damage control: appeasement, retreat, or vague statements meant to soften the blow and avoid further attacks and public scrutiny.

In most cases, they effectively reconcile with power centers rather than confront them, thereby reinforcing the very narratives that discredit the civic and progressive spheres. They fear backlash more than they value truth, and brand preservation often trumps moral clarity.

In terms of building, defending, and embodying democratic values, these organizations are surprisingly weak, especially when it comes to diversity, inclusion, and the universal application of human rights. They speak in floscules – buzzwords and platitudes – while avoiding uncomfortable truths and failing to respond with courage or integrity to the pressing moral questions of our time.

In doing so, they leave a vacuum – one easily filled by authoritarian power centers that thrive on populist rhetoric and offer seductive, simplistic answers to complex social problems. While democratic actors tiptoe and self-censor, authoritarians roar.

Meanwhile, the world is being ravaged by Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, the horror of ethnic cleansing in Gaza, gross human rights violations across South America, and bloody conflicts throughout Africa. And above it all, the world is shaken by the thunder of rising authoritarianism.

Yet these self-declared defenders of democracy merely whisper, retreating into vanity, proceduralism, and elitism, while the world cries out for courage.

The absence of substance, solidarity, and courage among these elitist structures doesn’t just render them ineffective, it makes them part of the problem. It enables the erosion of trust, weakens the democratic fabric, and ultimately leaves societies more vulnerable to manipulation, fear, and authoritarian control.

I wish I weren’t right.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Next Post
RETHINK: Change your perspective, preserve the planet

RETHINK: Change your perspective, preserve the planet

Don’t miss latest news from our site free!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Recent News

LOT OF MONEY, LITTLE MUSIC: The political map and the financing of political parties ahead of the 2025 local elections

LOT OF MONEY, LITTLE MUSIC: The political map and the financing of political parties ahead of the 2025 local elections

August 20, 2025
Albanian political campus ahead of local elections: Between narratives and political pragmatism

Albanian political campus ahead of local elections: Between narratives and political pragmatism

August 20, 2025
Independent candidates between political games and institutional barriers

Independent candidates between political games and institutional barriers

August 19, 2025
Academic Voices, Propaganda Echoes: How Intellectuals in the Balkans Reinforce Pro-Russian Narratives

Academic Voices, Propaganda Echoes: How Intellectuals in the Balkans Reinforce Pro-Russian Narratives

August 18, 2025
History Reloaded: The Price of Appeasing Russia

History Reloaded: The Price of Appeasing Russia

August 17, 2025

[adrotate banner=”3″]

[mc4wp_form id=”21829″]

  • About Theme
  • About us
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • Authors List
  • Blog
  • Cart
  • Checkout
  • Civil.Today
  • Contact
  • Contact
  • COOKIE POLICY
  • COPYRIGHT
  • Digital library
  • Edit
  • Edit Profile
  • Forum
  • FullWidth Page
  • Gallery
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Insert Post
  • My Account
  • Pinterst Style
  • Posts
  • Pricing
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • Resilient Journalism Countering Disinformation and Propaganda publication
  • Sample Page
  • Shop
  • ShortCodes
  • Signup Page
  • Sitemap Page
  • TERMS & CONDITIONS
  • TimeLine Blog
  • Timeline Page
  • Topics
  • Videos

© 2021 CIVIL - Center For Freedom

No Result
View All Result
  • NEWSROOM
  • POLITICS
  • SOCIETY
  • ECONOMY
  • OPINION
    • POINT OF VIEW
    • EDITORIAL
  • WORLD
  • MONITORING
  • WAR IN UKRAINE
  • About us
  • Impressum
  • Contact

© 2021 CIVIL - Center For Freedom